De Oppresso Liber

Girls First Day at school

deoppressoliber — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:56:30 +0000

We dropped off Lexi and Liena this morning to start a new year of academia. Both girls had nervous excitement but they will do great! Lexi will be doing her first year of “all day” school. Liena will be in CARES (a child care program) in the morning and then have Kindergarten in the afternoon. Last year it was opposite for Lexi, she had Kindergarten in the morning and CARES in the afternoon.

Of Life’s Wind and Waves

deoppressoliber — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:06:30 +0000

You have led me to the sadness
I have carried this pain
On a back bruised, nearly broken
I’m crying out to you

I will sing of Your mercy
That leads me through valleys of sorrow
To rivers of joy

When death like a Gypsy
Comes to steal what I love
I will still look to the heavens
I will still seek your face

But I fear you aren’t listening
Because there are no words
Just the stillness and the hunger
For a faith that assures

While we wait for rescue
With our eyes tightly shut
Face to the ground using our hands
To cover the fatal cut

And though the pain is an ocean
Tossing us around, around, around
You have calmed greater waters
Higher mountains have come down

I will sing of Your mercy
That leads me through valleys of sorrow
To rivers of joy

From Jars of Clay, Valley Song.

In the World; Of the World

deoppressoliber — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:29:58 +0000

I am dying because I am black, one says.
Or because I am poor.
Or because I speak bad Spanish or Arabic.
Or because they found me in the Third Street Bar.
Or because my husband ran away.
You see, we are of the world in spite of everything
and we cling to the world’s reasons.
…Hayden Carruth, Scrambled Eggs & Whiskey.

Grace is for Losers

deoppressoliber — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:57:39 +0000

“When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth” (Mt. 19:22).

The rich, the powerful, the successful in this life are prohibited from entering the Kingdom of God. It is not because the Kingdom of God is not offered but because grace is for losers.

Discipleship

deoppressoliber — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:29:15 +0000

“Doctrine and life are to be distinguished. Life is as bad among us as among the papists (Roman Catholic Church). Hence we do not fight and damn them because of their bad lives. Wyclif and Hus, who fought over the moral quality of life, failed to understand this…When the Word of God remains pure, even if the quality of life fails us, life is placed in a position to become what it ought to be. That is why everything hinges on the purity of the Word. I have succeeded only if I have taught correctly”
…Martin Luther.

What Luther means by this is that the very point of the doctrine of Justification by grace alone (the central doctrine of the reformation) is that discipleship is not dependent upon its results. The Christian was called to be faithful, not successful.

Luther’s Conversion

deoppressoliber — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:14:59 +0000

Luther has discribed his conversion experience as sitting on the toliet. Perhaps a better discription is as “a giant dose of theological laxative that purged Luther of his religious constipation” (Lindbert, The Eurpoean Reformations, 18)

The Eighth Commandment

deoppressoliber — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:39:51 +0000

I was reading Luther’s shorter catechism and was struck by his interpretation of the Eighth Commandment:

“We should fear and love God, and so we should not tell lies about our neighbor, nor betray, slander, or defame him, but should apologiz for him, speak well of him, and interpret charitably all that he does” (my italics).

I have noticed this a lot recently. People are prone to interpret what people do and say in a predominantly negative way. We can all take a lesson from Luther’s understanding here and give more charity to understanding people and less suspicion to people’s motivations.

Contextualization

deoppressoliber — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:31:34 +0000

On German Drinking Habits:

“Tomorrow I have to lecture on the drunkenness of Noah (Gen. 9:20-27), so I should drink enough this evening to be able to talk about that wickedness as one who knows by expreience…One must make the best of the vices that are peculiar to each land.”

–Martin Luther

Historical Interpretation

deoppressoliber — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:39:50 +0000

In Chapter 1 of The Historical Books Richard D. Nelson presents several observations concerning the type of literature that the Historical Books contain. Nelson is concerned to get the reader accustomed to reading the Historical Books from a non-modern perspective of history.
He writes, “many if not most of the sources used by the biblical historiographers cannot be accepted as trustworthy for direct historical reconstruction”. He backs his point be stating, “it is important to remember that no ancient source outside Israel mentions any Old Testament event or personality until the ninth century BCE” (my emphasis, 28).
He concludes his introduction by drawing into question the veracity of the Biblical text and implicitly its inspiration. He rightly notes that “Historiography is referential literature” that is, “the past as the writer thinks it took place” (my emphasis, 29). In other words, the reader of Nelson is to conclude that there is no verifiable history of either events or people, behind the Historical Books before the Ninth century BCE.

An interesting “fact” is the Merneptah Stele which is dated to the thirteenth Century (1208 BCE). In this inscription it mentions Israel as those whom Pharaoh conquered in Canaan. This first appearance of Israel, “on the stage of verifiable history” does not prove the exodus from Egypt or the conquest of Canaan. Rather, “no independent historical evidence supports any of these accounts. In fact, recent archaeological study indicates that Israel never actually invaded Canaan from the outside, and certainly not in the unified, massive way described in the book of Joshua” (31).

However, one must ask, does the truth of an account necessarily depend on extra biblical references to “event”s or “personality” for it to be true? Should we assume that Power/Prominence on the world scene is a necessary factor in establishing the truthfulness of narrative accounts of people and events?

Sin and Grace

deoppressoliber — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:15:38 +0000

I was reflecting on what it means to be simultaniously in sin and grace. As Christians we stand justified before God on account of Jesus Christ’s imputed righteousness. Sin has been dealt with on the Cross. The wrath of God was poured out on Jesus Chirst for the elect and through His obedience we are made righteous (Rom. 5:19).

What does this mean for the person who stands justified and yet sins? Or better yet, how should the Christian see his sinfulness? Far too often I have come across Christians who feel condemned by a sin they have comitted or a pattern of sin they have been unable to overcome. This unfortunate perspective has been butressed by the pietistic stran of evangelicalism which asserts that fellowship with God is lost when a Christian sins.

In thinking about these issues and reflecting on my own sin, I believe there is a better perspective of sin in the Christian life. Spiritual maturity is directly relfected in the character and actions of the Christian. To use the concept of maturity is not to minimize the seriousness of sin or to negate its very real consequence. Nevertheless, the Christian sins out of a lack of spiritual maturity.

What I mean by maturity is Christ likeness. Be Holy as He is Holy! We grow in our likeness to Jesus Christ and that spiritual progress is reflected in all areas of our life: spiritual, moral, physical. As we are progressively formed into the image of Jesus Christ sin is mortified in the flesh.

Do we ever come to full maturity? Not this side of eternity but “he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus” (Phil. 1:6).